Friday, February 28, 2014

Anika - Memory, Counter Memory, and Mythology.


Greek Mythology and Memory

Studying Greek Mythology is always an interesting endeavor, since the stories and legends tend to alter every few hundred years. Why, you ask? Well, just look at how Greek culture passed along its own true histories: memory and oration. Most of us have played the game “Telephone”, where you pass along a whispered phrase around a circle and when it gets to the person who started the phrase, that person then states the new and usually completely different phrase. This game usually involves less than 20 people, take this same concept and plug it into Greek history. Thousands of people were told stories and each one of them remembered different bits and changed other facts slightly; but hundreds of years in the future, all of these varied accounts of the same story are floating around and who can say what the original version was exactly. With just one story, an account would be so varied years later, but this society has their entire history of wars, famous people, orations and belief system to remember(not read and remember, just listening to the stories). No wonder there are so many versions of different myths. To add to the confusion, the Romans were oddly interested in adapting the Greek system of ‘religion’ to their own.  The result was quite complicated: each Roman god/goddess had a Greek counterpart with similar stories, but stories from both the Greeks and Romans. The Romans had developed their own religious traditions, themes, and ideas, but decided that they needed more stories and legends to add to the mix. Now an extra layer of confusion blankets the whole issue with new/same names, two different languages which adds translating errors, and different images/icons of each of these gods. No wonder there are so many versions of the classic myths.
                        Another interesting lens to view the idea of mythology and memory through is that of the film adaptations that have been done in the past decade or so. Troy, the 2004 movie starring Peter O’Toole, Eric Bana, Brad Pitt, Diane Kreuger, and Orlando Bloom, contains many historical inaccuracies, in terms of how it differs from both the Iliad and Odyssey and Aeneid. However, one could argue that no one really knows the truth about the Trojan War. Recent archeological digs have discovered remains of what they believe used to be “Troy” and there was evidence that a great battle was fought on the shores in front of the city in ~1250 BC. The other army is believed to be that of the Mycenaeans (the army headed by Menelaus). There are many other movies which base their storyline in Homer’s and Vergil’s works. One of my favorite adaptations that is not “obviously” descended from these myths is the film Winter’s Bone, starring Jennifer Lawrence. Winter’s Bone explores many themes similar to the ones found in Greek mythology, from Odysseus’ Odyssey to the voyage for the Golden Fleece as well as the issues found in the Orestia Trilogy. Ree, the main character, is left to take care of her invalid mother and siblings while her father has disappeared, having put up their home for his jail bond.  She must seek for her meth-cooking father in order to figure out what has happened in order to save her family from homelessness.  The inclusion of an underworld visit, secrets and unknown actions, journeys, xenia and hospitality expectations, the patriarchal society, and strong blood ties make this film akin to a modern myth.
            However, with the authorship of these epic works in question in the air, none of these adaptations or original works can truly be held up to light of true history. Since no one can prove that Homer actually wrote these works, it seems that the whole issue of memory and historical accuracy may be irrelevant. Perhaps the entire true history of the Greeks died with their society thousands of years ago. Might this same “blackout” of history happen with us, since everything is now on the internet? What would happen if future generations used a completely different system of communication? I suppose this only encourages us to communicate through stories, even if they are not completely accurate, so that future generations might have some interesting stories to pass along hundreds of years in the future.

            Memory. Can we bring it back as a form of communication and rhetoric?

No comments:

Post a Comment