Sunday, April 27, 2014

Final project

Kenya Moody
4/24/14

Rape Culture
I believe that rape culture should be eliminated from our society. Athletes or celebrities, even people with just a high social status or wealth, get of for crimes mostly like rape against women with a slap on the wrist.The rape culture in America is looked mostly at it being the victims fault. Crime like this occurs, often, most time the women are asked questions like what were you wearing, were you drinking, or what they have done to cause the assault. Never questioning the attackers choices at all. There are some people out there tat believe rape culture does not exist because, they aren't recognizing it but, the Rape culture in American has almost became a public norm and is even being explained as a normal inevitable and I believe the rape culture is responsible for why men today are getting away for crimes like this. Rape culture has a lot to do with sentencing time. Referring to my last sentence, as the culture being a normal inevitable, jurors in court cases don't recognize it either, which I will began to explain later in this essay.
I decided to do my claim on this topic because the culture of it is getting less recognized day by day. The culture hasn't evolved at all especially for
"important" people. People that we see as athletes or idols, we often think things like this that happen to them are often common mistakes, that aren't taken seriously or looked at as serious crimes. In, specific rape cases attractive defendants are less likely to be viewed as guilty than unattractive defendants. We often blame the women's background or say, "she was asking for it," giving the crime and excuse for why it happened. Today it is getting more and more recognized by me, how the publics ignorance over someone social status means that these crimes cause by a person like that can do five to no years at all when it comes to sentencing. Not to mention the distractions that takes place when trial cases like this happens, such as, judges, jurors, and others surrounded by the case will stop at nothing when it comes to their idols.
For example of men "getting off" for crimes like this would be the Steubenville, Ohio case. Steubenville was known for there great football team so of course if anything came between that, that would be a problem. The small town got huge publicity when Savannah Dietrich had been a victim of rape at a party and also a victim to social media when she was past out and Trent Mays and Malik Richmond fell suspect to raping and having everyone at the party take picture of her naked. Not only did the 16 year old girl get raped and taken pictures of, she also had gotten peed on by the boys.During the whole trial they
really never talked about the victim or at least mentioned their name. Even when you google the Steubenville trial, its all about the boys and from my research I didn’t even see her name or sometimes her even mentioned, just saying "rape case" on websites. The boys were recognized for their great athletic skills in football being only just a sophomores. So that's why when they went to trial, after seeing the video, pictures and other evidence of that night, the judged ruled out that they just get one year in jail. Which, by the way they got out early so they didn't even finish there sentence anyway. This story got huge media but, also reminded other of the Big Dan's gang rape that happened 30 years earlier in New Bedford, Massechutes. It's similar to the Steubenville case because in Big Dan's Tavern she was raped on a pin ball machine with bystanders watching and cheering. No one had called the police for two hours. Well, that was back in 1983, so really the only thing that has changed this time, and not for the better, is that bystanders that were involved in the Steubenville case had cell phones and took pictures of the girl naked.
Discrimination shows a big part in rape cases also. Jurors judged non-celebrity black defendants more than white defendants accused of the same crime (Shaw and Skolnick 1995). People's perspectives about rape are influenced by race and celebrity status and by there own gender as well. Judges have
historically been harsher on the defendants that have raped white women than black women (Field 1979). Of course, when the defendant is black and the rape victim is white, the punishment is always serverley. Kind of like that movie Rosewood, where in 1923, all the whites and blacks got along until white women was having sex with a black man but, got caught and yelled rape. The all the whites started a riot and killed 2,000 blacks in Rosewood. Even though it was a false accusation, the punishment was still severe and resulted in that. I feel no matter how far we advance in the years there are always going to be racist out there and laws that a racially discriminated, won't changed unless everyone recognizes it.
The Rape Shield Law was used when Kobe Bryant was accused of raping a nineteen year old hotel clerk. After she accuse Bryant of the rape she got a huge amount of publicity. Her name, phone number, yearbook photo, email address, ex-boyfriends, etc., was released to the public and the internet. Many public images like t-shirts, tank tops, and coffee mug feature derogatory images and words like "whore alert" and "lying bitch" that also displayed her doing sexual positions on Bryant. The accuser's mom went to trial again and that’s when they established The Rape Shield Law to protect rape victims personal life and sexaul
past at court, disclosing and private information about the accuser's personal life (The Privacy Protection for Rape Victims Act).
I believe with all the evidence collected and witnesses that take place in cases like this should reconsider the judges perspective when it comes to rape case like this. Jurors perspective also towards the victim is judged when the victim had reportedly been drinking, using drugs, and there character traits have been a complaint, such as they were "carelessness" and there gender role behavior. Even though, yes sometimes rape can be a hard thing to prove because, you can't just go off little vaginal tears, most evidences is pointed towards servre cases in tearing and bruising sometimes depending it you were drinking or not etc. Finch and Munro discovered that jurors rely on social convention meaning women who drink and flirt with the man cannot complain for the man's actions to want to engage in intercourse. Why do we blame women for the rapist in our world? When you go to a party, you always hear, "Don't get raped," when really it should be "Don't rape." Our society tends to blame victims because people are afraid of what hey don't know. They always expect that there is a reason behind rapist wanting to do this when there isn't guys just don't see the consequences when they are in heat of the moment. Being promiscuous is the number one excuse for rape victims', which doesn't make sense to me at all. It shouldn't matter if you’re
a hoe or not, you don't deserve to be violated that way. I understand that yes, there are common sense thing like, going to a athlete's room at 3 a.m., when obviously he's not going to want to watch a movie around that time. Not saying that what he/she did or felt like they were obligated to do it right.
Every rape victim needs a support system. I have a personal story that my friend/former co-worker told me happen to her, here in downtown Lincoln. I believe a guy had spiked everyone's drink including the bartender but, he must of saw my friend about to faint because he drove her somewhere and the last thing she remembers is her waking up with bruises on the inner sides of her legs. I was shocked and my reaction to her was trying to stay calm and ask her if she remembered at least what he looked like and if it felt like she had sex at all, but, it was all a blur. It just sucks how in many situations, guys are getting away with that because really there's nothing that you can do but, raise a awareness for it and making it more recognized.http://instagram.com/kenyamoodaayy

Friday, April 25, 2014

Final Project

Here's the link to my website and twitter page:

http://meganday2013.wix.com/unlbingedrinking
https://twitter.com/died_campaign

Anika Top- Digital Media Campaign

Here is the link to my page:
https://twitter.com/fineartsmatter

final project-Amanda Zhang

about my final project, i created an interview video. i post on youtube as unlisted. here is the link






also, i found those very interesting and representative channels on youtube that about asian american and asian culture.
wongfu production    https://www.youtube.com/user/WongFuProductions
the fung bros     https://www.youtube.com/user/FungBrosComedy
justkidding films        https://www.youtube.com/user/JustKiddingFilms


Final Projecct (Saving one Hoof at a Time) --Amber Robinson

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Saving-One-Hoof-At-A-Time/1427529730832425

Kieran Kissler's Final Project

https://twitter.com/GMOclassproject

#SomebodyNeedsYou

Maggie Reynolds, Tommy Hoenshell, Amber Jacobsen, & Jackie Tvrdik

YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28OVgUp8R2w

Twitter account: https://twitter.com/UNL_SaveALife

Twitter account symbol:


Final Project - Jesse Barlean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2ILWGJEqmU&feature=youtu.be

There she be.


Final Proj

The viral campaign I decided to create dealt with the legalization of marijuana.  Recently a Denver husband killed his wife and had taken marijuana before her murder.  Nancy Grace, who is known for her debate show on television, went to twitter to express how she felt about the situation.  Nancy Grace tweeted multiple times putting all of her blame on marijuana which was taken by the husband before the murder.  Nancy Grace’s last tweet about the topic quotes “How many people must die before this stops?! #PotToBlame?”  After Nancy Grace was done blaming marijuana and not the real situation behind the cause of the murder, actor Seth Rogen took to twitter and replied to Nancy Grace.  Seth Rogen replied to Nancy Grace saying “@NancyGraceHLN you are a f***ing dumbass.”  After Seth Rogen replied to Nancy about her over-exaggeration about the dangers of marijuana, many people took to twitter and used Nancy’s #PotToBlame hash tag as a way to capitalize on her mistake.  Individuals would go to twitter using this hash tag to tweet harmless effects of marijuana.  Examples of this are where people would speak about enjoying a really good morning breakfast and then putting #PotToBlame in the tweet.

Link to twitter account:
https://twitter.com/Pot_To_Blame

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Final Project

you tube video link: http://youtu.be/Jc2oZ-TxA-g

Gaby's Final Project (ChangeItU)

Website:
http://gabsphily.wix.com/uchangeit

Twitter page:
https://twitter.com/ChangeItU

Note* youtube video is on website!

I got the idea for my topic after listening to a speaker at the lied center during greek week. He was talking about the lack of diversity that colleges have and how it's sad that it's still a problem. He also touched on the issue of racism that occurs often on campuses and how both of this problems needed to stop, and it was our job as the students to change it. I really wanted to contribute to the cause so I decided that this could be my way of spreading the message. Even though I know I won't reach a ton of people, I still got to show you all as my class and some of my friends as well. I decided to make a webpage that included a youtube video on the home page made by me and then three separate pages that explained my topic, gave my contact info, and provided a call to action.
YouTube video link- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MadKDimLugs&feature=youtu.be

Instagram @ notwhatuthought





Ava Clarke's Viral Campaign: The Shadow Children- Prison Reform in America #ShadowChildren #AbolishIncarcerationNation



 
Facebook Page can be located here: https://www.facebook.com/ChildrenOfTheShadows
The Shadow Children also may be contacted through their Email: Abolishincarcerationnation@gmail.com
Or their Google+ account
Or their YouTube account
Exclusive interview with Frances Kaye:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxoF4DEdasU#t=653

 

http://revolution-news.com/incarcerated-workers-launch-nonviolent-work-strike-new-jim-crow-across-alabama-prisons/
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-cost-of-a-nation-of-incarceration/

http://www.policymic.com/articles/81233/norway-treats-its-inmates-like-people-the-result-is-a-system-america-can-only-dream-of

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/diane-dimond/the-us-prison-system_b_5179372.html

http://harvardmagazine.com/2013/03/the-prison-problem

Like, Follow, and Share to spread awareness about this issue!

How to Help:

~Contact your local representatives and voice your concerns about the issues within the prison system...
~Volunteer within the prison system

Volunteer Organizations in the US:

~AVP (Alternatives to Violence Project)
http://avpnebraska.wordpress.com/

Volunteer in Nebraska Prisons:

~AVP (Alternatives to Violence Project)
http://avpnebraska.wordpress.com/

~Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
http://www.corrections.nebraska.gov/volunteer.html


Who to Contact in Nebraska:
Senators of Nebraska: Deb Fischer and Mike Johans

Deb Fischer:
P.O. Box 83287
Lincoln, NE 68501
Phone: 402-742-0084

Mike Johans:
Email: mike_johanns@johanns.senate.gov
Office Information: http://www.johanns.senate.gov/public/?p=OfficeLocations

Contact us:

~Send us a message on Facebook
~Email us at: AbolishIncarcerationNation@gmail.com
~Visit our YouTube Page: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU_1dHnLE_u7kYJJF3JJi8Q

James Butler-Gruett's Final Project: #ClassItUp Campaign


Check out live broadcasts of the Metropolitan Opera at Mary Riepma Ross Theater downtown in HD! The next one coming up is La Cenerentola.#ClassItUp http://theross.org/event.php?eid=752
Mary Riepma Ross Media Arts Center
theross.org
The Music Library is a great way to start listening to classical music at UNL! Also check out live concerts posted and hosted elsewhere in the School of Music! #ClassItUp http://libraries.unl.edu/music
Music Library | Libraries | University of Nebraska–Lincoln
libraries.unl.edu
The Music Library is one of six branch libraries in the UNL Libraries' system. It was established as a branch in the Westbrook Music Building in 1980, in part due to the efforts of the director of the School of Music, Dr.Raymond Haggh. The...
Classical Kids publishes great, educational, and entertaining audio introductions to various composers. Great way to start, especially if you have some nostalgia involved. #ClassItUp
http://www.amazon.com/Beethoven-Lives-Upstairs-Classical-Kids/dp/B00A538LCG/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&qid=1398136964&sr=8-8&keywords=classical+kids
Beethoven Lives Upstairs
www.amazon.com
Beethoven Lives Upstairs
#ClassItUp Campaign's central thesis-type video. Watch it!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0-rr0L5jME&feature=youtu.be
#ClassItUp Campaign
For educational purposes only. Video made for Jessy Ohl's Comm 198 class by James Butler-Gruett, to promote the #ClassItUp campaign.
Great documentary on contemporary opera singers and the Metropolitan Opera Auditions. Watch it! #ClassItUp
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odqrkmePyPQ
Documentary "The Audition" at the Music Academy of the West
Video courtesy of the Metropolitan Opera

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Counter-Public and Autonomist-Marxist working together

While I do think that continuous digital advancements distract some people and pull them away from physical relationships, I also agree with Dahlberg in that digital networked platforms has given a voice to people who could never have one. There may be less physical involvement in communities but people are getting informed faster and putting time into online communities rather than physically. I think both the counter-public and autonomist-marxist positions work well with this idea. Counter-public is basically saying that the internet is a place where the people who are normally excluded from the main identity can go and share their opinions. People can also use the internet to protest, find and connect people with the same opinion easier, and get informed on current issues as well.
A good example of where internet is a place to go to protest and inform others would be thedaywefightback.org .


The website is an internet protest against NSA surveillance. The site has one main target, the FISA Improvements Act. This act attempted to legalize phone record data in bulk. The protest also supports the USA Freedom Act.








There is another website that's main goal is to give young people a voice on any social issue that they feel needs to be heard. The website is called do something.org and they call themselves the largest organization for teens and social cause. Teens and younger voices are not listened to very often because of their assumed lack of credibility and knowledge, so sites like these gives them a chance to participate in online activism and contestation.















Continuing with the counter-public idea, there are those who have opinions that are usually shoved aside and not listened to nearly as much as more popular voices and voices with more credibility and authority. In recent years, this side of the public has had the opportunity to turn to the internet in order to make their thoughts and ideas heard. I find the position of counter-publics one of the most convincing because if you take away the internet, the people have very limited ways of participating democratically. The internet gives us endless options for contributing ideas to the public and sharing similar opinions with others. We are able to freely communicate through endless websites and educate ourselves and others. This is where I think of the autonomist-marxist position because it talks about how digital communication enables direct participation in democratic issues. Information is freely shared and open to anyone, which is helpful to people who aren't heard when trying to speak verbally about their opinions. The government is not involved and people have the freedom to say what they need to say. Both the counter-public position and autonomist-marxist positions supports the arguments of Dahlberg. The internet has opened up numerous doors for people to get more involved in their communities without having to do so in a physical way. When people feel like they are more heard, they are more willing to participate in political affairs.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

jake swanson

Visual enthymemes are basically arguments that are made through images. These arguments are not always complete. For instance they may leave out one of the arguments premises and let you as the audience member fill it in. In this way they force you to make their own argument complete which can be a very persuasive mode of argumentation.

Enthymemes are a clever way of making a point because by leaving out a premise the audience comes to the argument on their own making them more likely to change their opinions in the enthymemes favor. Now there are five types of enthymemes that we discussed in class. These are visual demonstrations, metaphors, symbols, archetypes and visual flags.

Visual demonstrations are basically enthymemes that have their own story like PETA's image of a mother holding a butchers knife with a bloody mangled chicken in her arms. This says that eating meat is like slaughtering animals.

Visual metaphors are just metaphors that are constructed and shown through imagery. Like the shotgun made of cigarettes that we looked at in class

Visual flags are essentially attention getters in images. These are typically shock based or sexy in nature. This may draw you in and then you are left to determine the argument made.

Visual symbols are basically when an image creates a symbolic argument. This relies upon a common public perception. Obama firing a gun was a visual symbol. It seemed to just be a picture but an argument was made. The arguement however is understood if context is easily found.

Visual archetypes are visual comparisons between a situation and a well known story. This was explained through the beauty and the beast picture from class where Palin was the beauty and McCain the beast.

I find enthymemes to be incredibly persuasive myself. They are difficult to argue against as they leave part of its construction to you. Today enthymemes are everywhere in the world of advertising. They are especially popular online. They are a simple and efficient form of communication

Monday, March 31, 2014

Amanda Zhang-- lincoln dahlberg


          in class we discussed five competing positions and on the possibility of digital democracy. for
my opinion, i agree with lincoln's argument that digital networked platform can enable news forms of democratic participation. and also i think that deliberative is really convincing.
          just like message sender send text to receiver, receiver can directly see the message from sender without any other steps or procedures. so sender can find exact and proper words to say to receiver and receiver can understand clearly after he got the message. but in digital network media age, internet produce large amount of informations everyday, and sometimes, if a writer finished an essay, he needs to find somewhere to publish it and there are many options for him to find platforms. and then, maybe editors from different websites will do some changes for the paper, like consensus. they will add or delete consensus in order to accomplish the highest positive effect for their own benefits. and sometime people won't choose appropriate words to describe a thing that cause people are uncertain about the truth of the issue. here is an example of hong kong. since hong kong was managed by chinese government, many negative events happened in hong kong in decades. public media announced and blamed on hong kong government that it was a wrong decision made by them before and result in today's condition.
quitccp.jpg       

           also, because of some uncertain news, people are led to doubt their mind and beliefs. just like the last instance, people didnt know the whole truth back of some events and they followed the media to blame on government and they started parades to show their arguments to government. people were criticizing government without enough evidences. meanwhile, they were many citizens immigrant to canada or the united states at that time. therefore, after all parades and the truth came out, people appealed that internet or public media should be better concentrating on their jobs rather than spreading wrong and meaningless informations online. people suggested that works of public media should listen to what people are willing to do and hear in order to decrease the possibility of this sort off issue's. because internet and other digital media are the first form and resource for people to receive informations so it is significant to publish something deliberative and convinced.
          so, i think that deliberative is a really important element for public to know the truth of the issue and it is really convincing.
            

Putnam Theory is Outdated

            While Robert Putnam’s interpretation of digital media as a cause of disengagement was debatable at the time Bowling Alone was published, since 2000 however, Putnam’s ideas have become antiquated. With the advent of the digital age and the plugging in of human society, what was once perceived as a threat to social capital is now its greatest protector and developer since bowling leagues.
Lincoln Dahlberg’s perception of the internet as a tool for democratic engagement is more persuasive because he uses up-to-date examples of the internet as a tool for social capital development. Whether he is explaining counter-publics with the South Asian Women’s Network or Autonomist Marxist via wikis, Dahlberg’s evidence shows thousands of people banding together and creating communities on the internet. Now people often belong to dozens of internet group, and they can use the internet to meet people as well as build social capital online.
The deliberative digital democracy position says that people will get together in forum and deliberate on their views of politics. “Rational deliberation is also identified as taking place, if less ideally, through the writing and commentary of online citizen journalism and ‘serious’ media sites” (Dahlberg). Normal citizens can form communities and discuss with one another in digital forums rather than the bowling alley or PTA meetings. Inciting change does not have to come from finding your way to a socialist club or a feminist rally. While Putnam claims that we are losing valuable interactions, they are merely changing form. For instance, there is a Facebook group for the United Students Against Sweatshops on campus that often posts about their meetings and their progress with the university bookstore. While most people cannot be there physically, the group meets once a week at night, allowing people to join and keep up with their progress and comment on their actions using Facebook. If the online group did not exist, that sphere of influence would be inaccessible to the population of students who do not have the time or ability to make their meetings. Rather than the internet destroying social capital, it is actually building it. Allowing people to get connected with one another when they otherwise would not have been able to due to location and time. The internet is therefore building our communities and facilitating democracy by allowing the free exchange of ideas.  

Life in the minority world
Putnam’s theory of people needing to be physically near each other to gain one another’s trust and be amiable is outdated. If you want to join a bowling club, there are a plethora of groups on Facebook to meet your social needs or you could bowl online with thousands of other people. Putnam’s shortcomings probably arise from the years that his research was taken. The late 90’s had far less social media sites. Facebook was several years from its inception and other technological advances such as faster computers and better design made the internet sphere seem less attractive. Dahlberg’s theories have a better base in contemporary society, so his position is intuitively superior and with an almost endless stream of counterexamples to Putnam’s argument, making Dahlberg more convincing. 

Digital Democracy-Amber Robinson


Between, Robert Putman, and, Lincoln Dahlberg,  point view on the digital democracy, I believe that the Lincoln Dahlberg had a more convincing agreement for the four different positions. In each of the four different positions of the liberal-individualist, deliberative individualist, counter-public, and autonomist Marxist. Dahlberg at the beginning of his abstracts he states, “to aim is to draw attention to different understanding of what extending democracy through digital media.” He did that exact throughout his article.

As liberal-individualist provides information about a specific topic that may be important at the time. Also, there will be groups that will be assembly by people all over the world that believe in protesting against that specific topic. One of the examples that, Dahlberg, suggests is Avaaz. On this website demonstrates how someone could start their own petition, the different stories that going on throughout the world. Currently there are 34,458,442 people that are involved world-wide a member of Avaaz. Even Avaaz website states, “Avaaz is the campaigning community bringing people-powered politics to decision-making worldwide.”  
http://www.avaaz.org/en/



To me this first one that convinced me about, Dahlberg, article, because right there at that website gave the perfect example how liberal-individualist can be used to the advantage of digital democracy. This website was designed for people to step up and make decisions, just as, Dahlberg stated in his article, “liberal-individualist effective transmission of information and viewpoints between individual and representative decision-making process.”

Even though, Dahlberg talks about deliberial individual, he mentioned later in his article about the counter-publics being more affective subject. An example of this is cycle lane that used in class. This video brings about a serious matter for bicyclist, however, the producer is able to turn the video into a way that brings the point across in a funny matter. Once this video was able to go viral, the video was able to spread and people started to “ride for lane.”

 

With this one video being an example of counter-publics, Dahlberg, states in his article that, “further action that is happening with the digital media it has strengthen the voice of alternative, marginalized or otherwise oppressed groups.” I believe this is true, because having one voice of alternatives that can be done raises the groups that will do something for the issue, thus once again the digital democracy support with Dahlberg article.

Finally, Dahlberg, talks about autonomist Marxist in his article stating, “A sense of self-organized and inclusive participants in common productive activities that by pass centralized state and capitalized systems, which are understood to be necessarily anti-democratic and has common network.” By, Dahlberg, stating this in his article shows a well example about autonomist Marxist, because an autonomist is meant to be a group that is formed, but has no leader, because this group is meant to be as one body of people.